Screener/Seismic Foundation

Seismic Foundation

Focused on societal resilience in the era of transformative AI.

HQ🇺🇸 US
Est2025
Size1-10
EU AI ActMinimal
Score
36.6 / 100
Evidence
1 items
Confidence
low

Developing safety practices - core foundations in place with room for improvement.

Weaknesses:Governance Maturity, Technical Safety, Risk Assessment, Regulatory Readiness, External Engagement
Focus Areas
societal resiliencetransformative aifield building

Strengths

No notable strengths identified

Risks

  • Technical score (30) - significant gap
  • Regulatory score (30) - significant gap
  • Low evidence coverage (1 items)
  • Risk score (35) - significant gap
Table of Contents

Security Assessment

Security-relevant indicators for vendor evaluation

Security Posture
33
TS-01dim: 30
Red Teaming & Pre-deployment Testing
Adversarial testing before deployment
TS-05dim: 30
Robustness & Adversarial Resilience
Resistance to adversarial attacks
RA-01dim: 35
Sector-Specific Risk Assessment
Risk analysis for deployment context
RA-03dim: 35
Dual-Use & Misuse Risk
Dangerous capability awareness
RA-07dim: 35
Incident History & Track Record
Past incidents and response quality
EE-04dim: 48
Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Bug bounty or CVE reporting process
Incident History
Seismic Foundation incident records sourced from AIAAIC Repository and public reporting.
Integration: AIAAIC, OECD AI Incidents Monitor
Third-Party Audits
External audit reports, SOC 2 attestations, and ISO certifications verified where published.
Sources: Company filings, registry lookups
CVE & Disclosures
Known vulnerabilities and security advisories from NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, and vendor pages.
Sources: NVD, GHSA, vendor disclosure pages

Dimension Breakdown

GM
Governance Maturitypreliminary
Published policies, corporate structure, safety mandate, whistleblowing, executive commitment.
40
TS
Technical Safetypreliminary
Benchmarks, adversarial robustness, fine-tuning safety, watermarking, model cards, research output.
30
RA
Risk Assessmentpreliminary
Dangerous capability evaluations, thresholds, external testing, bug bounty, halt conditions.
35
RR
Regulatory Readinesspreliminary
ISO 42001, EU AI Act compliance, GPAI obligations, international commitments, incident reporting.
30
EE
External Engagementpreliminary
Survey participation, research support, transparency, behavior specs, open-source contributions.
48

Social Impact & Safety Profile

Moderate

Seismic Foundation's entire mission is societal resilience - understanding and preparing for the social impacts of transformative AI. As a nonprofit, their work is inherently social-impact focused, though measurable commitments are still being established.

societal resiliencetransformative ai preparedness

Peer Comparison

Center for AI Safety
B-50.2

Field Building

Compare
Apart Research
C-39.6

Field Building

Compare
BlueDot Impact
C-35

Field Building

Compare
AI Safety Camp
D+30.4

Field Building

Compare
Compare side-by-side →

Data Sources & Methodology

Scoring methodology v0.1 · 40 indicators · 6 frameworks

Last assessment: 2026-03-23 · Confidence: low · Evidence: 1 items

NIST AI RMF · EU AI Act · ISO 42001 · FLI AI Safety Index · MLCommons AILuminate · METR

How is this company scored? →Full methodologyView in Screener

Scores reflect publicly available information. A low score may indicate limited transparency rather than poor safety practices.