Screener/NVIDIA

NVIDIA

Dominant AI compute provider with growing AI safety tooling (NeMo Guardrails) but limited direct governance commitments.

HQ🇺🇸 US
Est1993
Size10001+
nvidia.com
Score
42.0 / 100
Evidence
7 items
Confidence
medium

Developing safety practices - core foundations in place with room for improvement.

Strengths:Technical Safety
Weaknesses:Governance Maturity, Risk Assessment, Regulatory Readiness, External Engagement
Focus Areas
GPUsAI infrastructureNeMo Guardrailscompute

Strengths

No notable strengths identified

Risks

  • Risk score (35) - significant gap
  • Regulatory requires attention
Table of Contents

Security Assessment

Security-relevant indicators for vendor evaluation

Security Posture
43
TS-01dim: 50
Red Teaming & Pre-deployment Testing
Adversarial testing before deployment
TS-05dim: 50
Robustness & Adversarial Resilience
Resistance to adversarial attacks
RA-01dim: 35
Sector-Specific Risk Assessment
Risk analysis for deployment context
RA-03dim: 35
Dual-Use & Misuse Risk
Dangerous capability awareness
RA-07dim: 35
Incident History & Track Record
Past incidents and response quality
EE-04dim: 42
Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Bug bounty or CVE reporting process
Incident History
NVIDIA incident records sourced from AIAAIC Repository and public reporting.
Integration: AIAAIC, OECD AI Incidents Monitor
Third-Party Audits
External audit reports, SOC 2 attestations, and ISO certifications verified where published.
Sources: Company filings, registry lookups
CVE & Disclosures
Known vulnerabilities and security advisories from NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, and vendor pages.
Sources: NVD, GHSA, vendor disclosure pages

Dimension Breakdown

GM
Governance Maturitypreliminary
Published policies, corporate structure, safety mandate, whistleblowing, executive commitment.
45
TS
Technical Safetypreliminary
Benchmarks, adversarial robustness, fine-tuning safety, watermarking, model cards, research output.
50
RA
Risk Assessmentpreliminary
Dangerous capability evaluations, thresholds, external testing, bug bounty, halt conditions.
35
RR
Regulatory Readinesspreliminary
ISO 42001, EU AI Act compliance, GPAI obligations, international commitments, incident reporting.
38
EE
External Engagementpreliminary
Survey participation, research support, transparency, behavior specs, open-source contributions.
42

Social Impact & Safety Profile

Moderate

NVIDIA provides the foundational compute infrastructure for virtually all frontier AI development. Has released NeMo Guardrails (open-source LLM safety toolkit) and invests in AI safety research. However, as a hardware/platform company, direct governance of AI safety outcomes is limited. Export control compliance and compute governance are emerging areas of relevance.

compute governanceNeMo GuardrailsAI infrastructure safety

Peer Comparison

Confident Security
C+47

Robustness & Adversarial

Compare
Aim Security
C43.6

Robustness & Adversarial

Compare
Noma Security
C41.1

Robustness & Adversarial

Compare
Vendict
C40

Governance Tooling

Compare
Compare side-by-side →

Data Sources & Methodology

Scoring methodology v0.1 · 40 indicators · 6 frameworks

Last assessment: 2026-03-23 · Confidence: medium · Evidence: 7 items

NIST AI RMF · EU AI Act · ISO 42001 · FLI AI Safety Index · MLCommons AILuminate · METR

How is this company scored? →Full methodologyView in Screener

Scores reflect publicly available information. A low score may indicate limited transparency rather than poor safety practices.