Meta
Data gathering in process
Technology conglomerate. LLaMA open-weight models, FAIR research lab.
Score
43.8 / 100
Evidence
4 items
Developing safety practices - core foundations in place with room for improvement.
Strengths:Technical Safety
Weaknesses:Governance Maturity, Risk Assessment, Regulatory Readiness, External Engagement
Focus Areas
foundation modelsopen source aisocial mediaconsumer ai
Safety Profile
Security Assessment
Security-relevant indicators for vendor evaluation
Security Posture
44
TS-01dim: 52
Red Teaming & Pre-deployment Testing
Adversarial testing before deployment
TS-05dim: 52
Robustness & Adversarial Resilience
Resistance to adversarial attacks
RA-01dim: 35
Sector-Specific Risk Assessment
Risk analysis for deployment context
RA-03dim: 35
Dual-Use & Misuse Risk
Dangerous capability awareness
RA-07dim: 35
Incident History & Track Record
Past incidents and response quality
EE-04dim: 48
Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Bug bounty or CVE reporting process
Incident History
Meta incident records sourced from AIAAIC Repository and public reporting.
Integration: AIAAIC, OECD AI Incidents Monitor
Third-Party Audits
External audit reports, SOC 2 attestations, and ISO certifications verified where published.
Sources: Company filings, registry lookups
CVE & Disclosures
Known vulnerabilities and security advisories from NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, and vendor pages.
Sources: NVD, GHSA, vendor disclosure pages
Dimension Breakdown
GM
Governance Maturitymedium
Published policies, corporate structure, safety mandate, whistleblowing, executive commitment.1 evidence items
GM-01
TS
Technical Safetymedium
Benchmarks, adversarial robustness, fine-tuning safety, watermarking, model cards, research output.1 evidence items
TS-07
RA
Risk Assessmentlow
Dangerous capability evaluations, thresholds, external testing, bug bounty, halt conditions.1 evidence items
RA-06
RR
Regulatory Readinesslow
ISO 42001, EU AI Act compliance, GPAI obligations, international commitments, incident reporting.EE
External Engagementmedium
Survey participation, research support, transparency, behavior specs, open-source contributions.1 evidence items
EE-06
Social Impact & Safety Profile
LimitedMeta publishes Responsible Use Guides for its open-source models but provides minimal measurable commitments to social impact mitigation. Open-source release strategy increases accessibility but also broadens dual-use risk surface. Social impact considerations are acknowledged in broad terms without detailed policy or external verification.
open source riskresponsible use guides
Need a detailed report for Meta?
Subscribe to express interest in indicator-level evidence, peer benchmarking, and regulatory gap analysis - or reach out to request a full company overview brief.