Screener/ArcherFaris

ArcherFaris

AI governance advisory firm providing policy and compliance consulting to organizations deploying AI.

HQ🇺🇸 US
Est2022
Size1-10
Score
42.0 / 100
Evidence
2 items
Confidence
low

Developing safety practices - core foundations in place with room for improvement.

Weaknesses:Governance Maturity, Technical Safety, Risk Assessment, Regulatory Readiness, External Engagement
Focus Areas
ai policyadvisorygovernance consulting

Strengths

No notable strengths identified

Risks

  • Low evidence coverage (2 items)
  • Technical score (35) - significant gap
Table of Contents

Security Assessment

Security-relevant indicators for vendor evaluation

Security Posture
39
TS-01dim: 35
Red Teaming & Pre-deployment Testing
Adversarial testing before deployment
TS-05dim: 35
Robustness & Adversarial Resilience
Resistance to adversarial attacks
RA-01dim: 42
Sector-Specific Risk Assessment
Risk analysis for deployment context
RA-03dim: 42
Dual-Use & Misuse Risk
Dangerous capability awareness
RA-07dim: 42
Incident History & Track Record
Past incidents and response quality
EE-04dim: 40
Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Bug bounty or CVE reporting process
Incident History
ArcherFaris incident records sourced from AIAAIC Repository and public reporting.
Integration: AIAAIC, OECD AI Incidents Monitor
Third-Party Audits
External audit reports, SOC 2 attestations, and ISO certifications verified where published.
Sources: Company filings, registry lookups
CVE & Disclosures
Known vulnerabilities and security advisories from NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, and vendor pages.
Sources: NVD, GHSA, vendor disclosure pages

Dimension Breakdown

GM
Governance Maturitypreliminary
Published policies, corporate structure, safety mandate, whistleblowing, executive commitment.
48
TS
Technical Safetypreliminary
Benchmarks, adversarial robustness, fine-tuning safety, watermarking, model cards, research output.
35
RA
Risk Assessmentpreliminary
Dangerous capability evaluations, thresholds, external testing, bug bounty, halt conditions.
42
RR
Regulatory Readinesspreliminary
ISO 42001, EU AI Act compliance, GPAI obligations, international commitments, incident reporting.
45
EE
External Engagementpreliminary
Survey participation, research support, transparency, behavior specs, open-source contributions.
40

Social Impact & Safety Profile

Emerging

ArcherFaris provides AI governance advisory services, helping organizations navigate the regulatory landscape and develop responsible AI practices. Small consultancy with limited public footprint but contributing to governance capacity building.

ai governance consultingpolicy advisory

Peer Comparison

AI Underwriting Company
A-70

Governance Tooling

Compare
Gray Swan
B+64.7

Evaluations & Benchmarking

Compare
Haize Labs
B56.7

Evaluations & Benchmarking

Compare
Goodfire
B56.3

Interpretability

Compare

Data Sources & Methodology

Scoring methodology v0.1 · 40 indicators · 6 frameworks

Last assessment: 2026-03-23 · Confidence: low · Evidence: 2 items

NIST AI RMF · EU AI Act · ISO 42001 · FLI AI Safety Index · MLCommons AILuminate · METR

Scores reflect publicly available information. A low score may indicate limited transparency rather than poor safety practices.